Diabolic Delight

In Britain, yet another storm is brewing. Nadia Eweida, a British Airways gate agent, has been suspended for refusing to remove her cross necklace while on duty. Julie McCaffery of the Mirror writes


IT is smaller than a 10 pence piece and all but invisible to people standing just inches away.

Yet Nadia Eweida’s tiny white gold cross is at the centre of a huge legal row that has engulfed Britain’s biggest airline and infuriated religious groups.

Check-in worker Nadia, 55, was forced to take unpaid leave by British Airways after refusing to remove the Christian emblem. But she claims it is a clear display of double standards as Muslims can wear head scarves and Sikh males their turbans.

As usual, Nadia is an exceptional employee, having worked at BA for seven years. She is firm in standing up for herself and her faith. It wasn’t an issue until she and other team members attended “diversity training”.Heh.

She [Nadia] said: “My case shows a company so scared of upsetting a minority that it has swung too far to the other side and upset the majority.

“It is clearly not fair that I am prohibited from wearing my cross, when Muslim ladies are allowed to wear a hijab and Sikhs freely wear turbans.

“They immediately identify that person’s religion. I imagine that’s why the teacher in Dewsbury is fighting to wear her veil.

She should be allowed to wear it in the classroom. I respect her views but what I don’t respect is one rule for some and another for others.”

Think it won’t happen here? It’s already begun….at schools. “Holiday” parties only. Students can discuss and learn about Hanukkah and Kwanzaa, but mentioning Christmas is “insensitive”. Mall workers greet you with “Happy Holidays”. City Halls can display anything BUT a Nativity during December. Office workers are required to remove religious pictures/plaques/placards from their cubicles so as not to “offend”. Shall I go on? At this rate, we’ll be there in no time.

Every time a symbol of God’s love is banished, Satan dances a little jig. Political correctness has made his job sooooooo easy.

Then we’re only a few steps away from our children being crucified in the neighborhood cul-de-sac.

Read the entire story and when you’re finished, drop British Air an email showing your support for Nadia. I’d list it under “Any other questions”.


  1. October 17, 2006 at 11:15 am

    […] Following up on yesterday’s post about different rules for different folks, we see that Harry Reid practices that same old-time religion of “Do As I Say, Not As I Do’. Cap’n Ed says Let’s get this straight. Reid’s failure to follow the Senate rules on disclosure in 2001, when he sat on the Ethics Committee, somehow got set up by the Republicans. Reid’s connection to an attorney involved in a bribery case that directly related to zoning decisions in Clark County, where they both owned property, was a Rovian plot set in motion in 1998. And now Reid’s new disclosures of property in an area where he has taken an intense legislative interest somehow relates to Republicans, when no one even mentioned the parcels in question — because Reid failed to disclose them during his entire time as Senate Minority Leader, while he has castigated Republicans for alleged ethical lapses. […]


  2. November 1, 2008 at 7:09 am

    […] don’t forget this, as […]


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: